<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205</id><updated>2011-12-14T18:54:45.450-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Democracy vs. The Constitution</title><subtitle type='html'>"John Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it."</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default?start-index=101&amp;max-results=100'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>222</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113874214496965067</id><published>2006-01-31T13:06:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-01-31T13:15:45.056-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Alito Confirmed</title><summary type='text'>Blah blah, let's see where this takes us. Anyway...Chaffee voted against Alito. Good on him for actually representing the views of his state. There's been a lot of discussion about him and NARAL, and I'm glad to see he's not wholly an empty suit.Kerry's filibuster attempt. Clearly the definition of lame, and yet...I am unimpressed by arguments that since he made the call from Switzerland, he is </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113874214496965067/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113874214496965067' title='6 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113874214496965067'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113874214496965067'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2006/01/alito-confirmed.html' title='Alito Confirmed'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>6</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113826616291537717</id><published>2006-01-26T00:29:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-01-26T01:02:43.020-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Difficult Unravelings</title><summary type='text'>One of the reasons it's so annoying to see political hay made out of legal decisions, is because legal arguments are very complicated and generally have a lot more going on that just the policy at hand.For instance, the most recent SCOTUS ruling on federal action against the Oregonian referendum on assisted suicide. They struck down attempts at federal intervention (at least by the executive </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113826616291537717/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113826616291537717' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113826616291537717'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113826616291537717'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2006/01/difficult-unravelings.html' title='Difficult Unravelings'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113808557558067699</id><published>2006-01-23T22:47:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-01-23T22:52:55.593-08:00</updated><title type='text'>"Truce" and Democratic talking points</title><summary type='text'>The right wing is getting a lot of hey from this offer of Bin Laden asking for a truce or whatnot. It shows Bush's war is working, and it has implicit connotations of liberals who would seek peace. Here's what I think the proper liberal response would be.Would we make a truce with Lee Harvey Oswald, or the DC sniper? No.Would we make a truce with Stalin or Pol Pot, or if possible Hitler? </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113808557558067699/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113808557558067699' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113808557558067699'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113808557558067699'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2006/01/truce-and-democratic-talking-points.html' title='&quot;Truce&quot; and Democratic talking points'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113580356707957438</id><published>2005-12-28T12:59:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-12-28T12:59:27.096-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Pay Raises</title><summary type='text'>TAPPED and MyDD are mentioning Congressional salary, raises, and why it’s silly that we pay the legislative branch so little. One of the commentators depicts an interesting point.      http://www.mydd.com/comments/2005/12/27/18428/723/10#10       With this topic, people should just expect a feingold plug... so here it is:   One of the very few such spoilsports is Senator Russell Feingold, a </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113580356707957438/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113580356707957438' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113580356707957438'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113580356707957438'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/12/pay-raises.html' title='Pay Raises'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113570885518283682</id><published>2005-12-27T10:37:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-12-27T10:43:54.660-08:00</updated><title type='text'>FISA</title><summary type='text'>There’s been a decent amount of posting about how the Democrats, by even getting angry at the FISA scandal, are taking Republican bait ( Ross, PPI, etc). The idea is that to the public you can never be viewed as “too extreme on National Security”. If there was graft or stupidity sure, but simply breaking some civil liberties in order to find Osama bin Laden will always… well not be appreciated, </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113570885518283682/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113570885518283682' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113570885518283682'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113570885518283682'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/12/fisa.html' title='FISA'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113527295767210621</id><published>2005-12-22T09:34:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2005-12-22T09:35:57.686-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Ohio Senate Race Watch</title><summary type='text'>    Sherrod Brown is becoming the most likely winner of a Democratic primary in the Ohio Senate Race. How unfortunate then, that he voted for the ANWR provision in the most recent House of Representatives vote. On background, the House Defense budget bill had ANWR oil drilling thrown in at the last minute (as a clear violation of budget procedure of course), and Democrats were put at risk of </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113527295767210621/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113527295767210621' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113527295767210621'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113527295767210621'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/12/ohio-senate-race-watch_22.html' title='Ohio Senate Race Watch'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113527292460919457</id><published>2005-12-22T09:34:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-12-22T09:35:24.623-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Ohio Senate Race Watch</title><summary type='text'>    Sherrod Brown is becoming the most likely winner of a Democratic primary in the Ohio Senate Race. How unfortunate then, that he voted for the ANWR provision in the most recent House of Representatives vote. On background, the House Defense budget bill had ANWR oil drilling thrown in at the last minute (as a clear violation of budget procedure of course), and Democrats were put at risk of </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113527292460919457/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113527292460919457' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113527292460919457'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113527292460919457'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/12/ohio-senate-race-watch.html' title='Ohio Senate Race Watch'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113502714510701872</id><published>2005-12-19T13:18:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2005-12-19T13:19:05.110-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Good posts on FISA scandal:</title><summary type='text'>Good posts on FISA scandal:       Crooked Timber listing the various rhetorical devices used to cover up this scandal.   Yglesias describes how this is the sort of thing you get when all you ever need in an argument is “my motivations are pure”.       Shrug. All I can feel is once again ire at people who trust in the limits set by legalisms. If the people of the country feel torture and </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113502714510701872/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113502714510701872' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113502714510701872'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113502714510701872'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/12/good-posts-on-fisa-scandal_19.html' title='Good posts on FISA scandal:'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113502713778175435</id><published>2005-12-19T13:18:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-12-19T13:18:57.783-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Good posts on FISA scandal:</title><summary type='text'>Good posts on FISA scandal:       Crooked Timber listing the various rhetorical devices used to cover up this scandal.   Yglesias describes how this is the sort of thing you get when all you ever need in an argument is “my motivations are pure”.       Shrug. All I can feel is once again ire at people who trust in the limits set by legalisms. If the people of the country feel torture and </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113502713778175435/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113502713778175435' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113502713778175435'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113502713778175435'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/12/good-posts-on-fisa-scandal.html' title='Good posts on FISA scandal:'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113502704604375428</id><published>2005-12-19T13:14:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2005-12-19T13:17:26.056-08:00</updated><title type='text'>War on Christmas-tide</title><summary type='text'>Sullivan is taking a break, and has two center-right bloggers covering for him. I really don’t get why so many people respect Douthat, but that being said, the first posts are good. Especially endearing to see all these intellectual right-wing dismissals of the War-on-Christmas stuff. It’s very reminiscent of all the intellectual right-wingers who doubted Bush in 2004 and felt he had veered too </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113502704604375428/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113502704604375428' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113502704604375428'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113502704604375428'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/12/war-on-christmas-tide_19.html' title='War on Christmas-tide'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113502700151282411</id><published>2005-12-19T13:14:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-12-19T13:16:41.526-08:00</updated><title type='text'>War on Christmas-tide</title><summary type='text'>Sullivan is taking a break, and has two center-right bloggers covering for him. I really don’t get why so many people respect Douthat, but that being said, the first posts are good. Especially endearing to see all these intellectual right-wing dismissals of the War-on-Christmas stuff. It’s very reminiscent of all the intellectual right-wingers who doubted Bush in 2004 and felt he had veered too </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113502700151282411/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113502700151282411' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113502700151282411'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113502700151282411'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/12/war-on-christmas-tide.html' title='War on Christmas-tide'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113475516100655880</id><published>2005-12-16T09:42:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-12-16T09:46:01.016-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Nasty, Liberal, and Short</title><summary type='text'>A somewhat liberal friend of mine commented that he reads NRO's the Corner because it's quick and to the point. "Liberals can't express themselves in anything less than three paragraphs, while most of the posts on the corner are two sentences."Now they're much to be said for thoughtful commentary, and I personally want long and evidence-backed pieces.  But I believe there's a lot of diversity in </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113475516100655880/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113475516100655880' title='5 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113475516100655880'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113475516100655880'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/12/nasty-liberal-and-short.html' title='Nasty, Liberal, and Short'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>5</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113475268415865098</id><published>2005-12-16T09:02:00.003-08:00</published><updated>2005-12-16T09:04:44.176-08:00</updated><title type='text'>CFR</title><summary type='text'> Just using this TAPPED article to bring up a counter-intuitive point about campaign finance.       A SCANDAL-RIDDEN WEEK. It hasn’t been a good week for Republican candidates, a surprising number of whom are now beset with some serious campaign finance scandals. Connecticut Governor M. Jodi Rell, who has pressed for stricter campaign finance regulations and who has pledged not to accept any </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113475268415865098/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113475268415865098' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113475268415865098'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113475268415865098'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/12/cfr_113475268415865098.html' title='CFR'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113475265923057060</id><published>2005-12-16T09:02:00.002-08:00</published><updated>2005-12-16T09:04:19.243-08:00</updated><title type='text'>CFR</title><summary type='text'>http://www.prospect.org/weblog/archives/2005/12/index.html#008652&gt; Just using this TAPPED article to bring up a counter-intuitive point about campaign finance:       A SCANDAL-RIDDEN WEEK. It hasn’t been a good week for Republican candidates, a surprising number of whom are now beset with some serious campaign finance scandals. Connecticut Governor M. Jodi Rell, who has pressed for stricter </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113475265923057060/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113475265923057060' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113475265923057060'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113475265923057060'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/12/cfr_113475265923057060.html' title='CFR'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113475260538009106</id><published>2005-12-16T09:02:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2005-12-16T09:03:25.400-08:00</updated><title type='text'>CFR</title><summary type='text'>&gt; Just using this TAPPED article to bring up a counter-intuitive point about campaign finance.       A SCANDAL-RIDDEN WEEK. It hasn’t been a good week for Republican candidates, a surprising number of whom are now beset with some serious campaign finance scandals. Connecticut Governor M. Jodi Rell, who has pressed for stricter campaign finance regulations and who has pledged not to accept any </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113475260538009106/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113475260538009106' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113475260538009106'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113475260538009106'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/12/cfr_16.html' title='CFR'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113475258559703022</id><published>2005-12-16T09:02:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-12-16T09:03:05.613-08:00</updated><title type='text'>CFR</title><summary type='text'>http://www.prospect.org/weblog/archives/2005/12/index.html#008652&gt; Just using this TAPPED article to bring up a counter-intuitive point about campaign finance.       A SCANDAL-RIDDEN WEEK. It hasn’t been a good week for Republican candidates, a surprising number of whom are now beset with some serious campaign finance scandals. Connecticut Governor M. Jodi Rell, who has pressed for stricter </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113475258559703022/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113475258559703022' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113475258559703022'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113475258559703022'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/12/cfr.html' title='CFR'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113457916235069643</id><published>2005-12-14T08:52:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-12-14T08:52:42.363-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Gun Rights Story</title><summary type='text'>Second Amendment fans are fond of telling how average home-owners protect their family and property with their constitutionally protected firearms. Just recently, one Cory Maye was woken in the middle of the night by a man busting through his bedroom door with no warning, and to protect his wife and daughter he shot the man dead.      Unfortunately for Cory, that man was a police officer, who was</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113457916235069643/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113457916235069643' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113457916235069643'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113457916235069643'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/12/gun-rights-story.html' title='Gun Rights Story'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113389051723007713</id><published>2005-12-06T09:30:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-12-06T09:35:46.646-08:00</updated><title type='text'>My Dear Wormwood</title><summary type='text'>Your concern about your client’s popular work is entirely understandable, indeed even adorable. It would be quite worrisome for Our Master if the church was able to spread through these entertaining books and associated baubles., and every movie ticket sold for the Chronicles of Narnia was one less soul who would be joining us in the ever-after. But do you not think we have dealt with this before</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113389051723007713/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113389051723007713' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113389051723007713'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113389051723007713'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/12/my-dear-wormwood.html' title='My Dear Wormwood'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113224851415039781</id><published>2005-11-17T09:23:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-17T09:28:34.193-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Judgifying I don’t like update</title><summary type='text'> A man who can write in one sentence “racial and ethnic quotas should not be allowed and that the Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion,” is not a man who only hates judicial activism. It’s been pretty clear that the Administration and Specter are trying to paint this guy as an enigmatic intellectual who could go any way on Roe v Wade, and now that’s fallen apart. I think that’s </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113224851415039781/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113224851415039781' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113224851415039781'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113224851415039781'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/11/judgifying-i-dont-like-update.html' title='Judgifying I don’t like update'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113207613678684979</id><published>2005-11-15T09:28:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-15T09:38:01.076-08:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>A few of you caught on the Daily Show last night that the White House is on the defensive about pre-war claims regarding WMD in Iraq.The Bipartisan Senate Select Committee On Intelligence Report "Did Not Find Any Evidence" Of Attempts To Influence Analysts To Change Intelligence. "Conclusion 83. The Committee did not find any evidence that Administration officials attempted to coerce, influence </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113207613678684979/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113207613678684979' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113207613678684979'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113207613678684979'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/11/few-of-you-caught-on-daily-show-last.html' title=''/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113164323703621857</id><published>2005-11-10T08:58:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-10T09:21:01.460-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Just Sad</title><summary type='text'>Yesterday TAPPED predicted that this would happen. House Republicans scrapped ANWR from their current budget billThis may sound like a good thing, but it is not. The reason this was scrapped was because it already passed the Senate version. Being in the Senate version, it will be relatively easy for the Conference Committee that reconciles the House and Senate Bills to put it back in the final </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113164323703621857/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113164323703621857' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113164323703621857'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113164323703621857'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/11/just-sad.html' title='Just Sad'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113155813552319708</id><published>2005-11-09T09:40:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-09T09:42:15.536-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Torture Round-Up</title><summary type='text'>Glad to see the blogosphere is finally re-vamping up on the torture issue.Neil’s got a post about the uselessness of pro-torture laws. It’s not very useful and even if it was, it’s not like Jack Bauer won’t do it anyway.For some weird-ass reason, conservative bloggers talking about torture issues are still discussing the Amnesty International report’s use of the word “gulag”. This was like five </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113155813552319708/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113155813552319708' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113155813552319708'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113155813552319708'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/11/torture-round-up.html' title='Torture Round-Up'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113146460613432886</id><published>2005-11-08T07:35:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-08T07:43:26.176-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Humble Judges</title><summary type='text'>The Supreme Court has taken up an indefinate detainee case. Yay.The new Chief Justice Roberts has previously ruled on this case, as a DC Appeals Judge. he ruled for the government. It can be assumed that Alito would rule the same way. Boo.But, Roberts has recused himself from the case, because of his previous affiliation. Yay.And as much as I disdain a defender of torture, I have to say I really </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113146460613432886/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113146460613432886' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113146460613432886'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113146460613432886'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/11/humble-judges.html' title='Humble Judges'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113138880241564506</id><published>2005-11-07T10:34:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-07T10:40:02.450-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Districting</title><summary type='text'>Reading Ezra’s site on the new California Ballot measure, and the endorsements he linked to, there seems to be this idea that there could be ideal voting districts. We want multiple things from voting for Representatives, but mainly competition and representation. As a democracy we recognize huge rates of incumbency are bad and in order to have a responsive government we need one that throws out </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113138880241564506/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113138880241564506' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113138880241564506'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113138880241564506'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/11/districting.html' title='Districting'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113087726226630224</id><published>2005-11-01T12:32:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-01T12:44:41.743-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Irony and Pennsylvania</title><summary type='text'>Matt and Ezra thinks it’s silly that Arlen Specter, senior Republican Senator from Pennsylvania and Chairman of the judiciary committee, seems to like Supreme Court nominee Judge Alito. Specter campaigned as pro-choice in Pennsylvania, and they believe that Pennsylvanians would find Alito’s pro-life positions very unpopular.The only real evidence we have of Alito being pro-life of course, is that</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113087726226630224/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113087726226630224' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113087726226630224'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113087726226630224'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/11/irony-and-pennsylvania.html' title='Irony and Pennsylvania'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113087043134905414</id><published>2005-11-01T10:39:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-01T10:40:31.363-08:00</updated><title type='text'>When Economics is Wrong</title><summary type='text'>Yglesias et al are paying attention to the hysteria regarding the HPV vaccine – a newish vaccine shot to stop women from getting cervical cancer, and men from transmitting it. I’m not sure why it’s come up today, but it’s the topic du jour.In particular, lots of conservatives are furious at the idea of mandatory child vaccination. And lots of liberals are sad that a need to insist their kids will</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113087043134905414/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113087043134905414' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113087043134905414'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113087043134905414'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/11/when-economics-is-wrong.html' title='When Economics is Wrong'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113086570442961096</id><published>2005-11-01T09:14:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-01T09:21:44.466-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Andrew Sullivan is a liberal.</title><summary type='text'>“The key thing to remember about Bush's nominees: they are all completely craven with respect to the executive's powers in wartime. And wartime is now defined as: for ever.”Liberal blogs really like bashing him these days because they think he likes to kill brown people, and any opinion shared with him must immediately be searched out for conservative influence. He also says really mean things </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113086570442961096/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113086570442961096' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113086570442961096'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113086570442961096'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/11/andrew-sullivan-is-liberal.html' title='Andrew Sullivan is a liberal.'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113086333237399389</id><published>2005-11-01T08:39:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-01T08:42:12.396-08:00</updated><title type='text'>"Judgifying I don't like"</title><summary type='text'>Other things that everyone should see.We found that justices vary widely in their inclination to strike down Congressional laws. Justice Clarence Thomas, appointed by President George H. W. Bush, was the most inclined, voting to invalidate 65.63 percent of those laws; Justice Stephen Breyer, appointed by President Bill Clinton, was the least, voting to invalidate 28.13 percent. The tally for all </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113086333237399389/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113086333237399389' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113086333237399389'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113086333237399389'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/11/judgifying-i-dont-like.html' title='&quot;Judgifying I don&apos;t like&quot;'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113079646232994187</id><published>2005-10-31T14:06:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-10-31T14:07:42.346-08:00</updated><title type='text'>On the New SCOTUS Nominee</title><summary type='text'>Short Version: He supports strip searches of ten-year old girls without warrant.We will have more Justices who are from Trenton, NJ, than who are of the fairer sex.Long Version: You ever heard the phrase “it’s all over but the shouting”? This is what that meant. I respect that Sirota is more qualified and less-cronylike than Miers was, but that’s simply a matter of meeting the bare minimum </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113079646232994187/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113079646232994187' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113079646232994187'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113079646232994187'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/on-new-scotus-nominee.html' title='On the New SCOTUS Nominee'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113077929819167653</id><published>2005-10-31T09:21:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-10-31T09:21:38.193-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Predictions</title><summary type='text'>In light of the Supreme Court nomination and arguments going on about Democrats in congressional races, I thought it was apropos to make a few predictions about what I think will happen over the next two years.1. Justice Alito will be confirmed despite a fierce battle where most of the public sides with Democrats but doesn’t care enough to convince the moderate Republicans to betray their party.2</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113077929819167653/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113077929819167653' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113077929819167653'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113077929819167653'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/predictions.html' title='Predictions'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113077892359738282</id><published>2005-10-31T09:15:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-10-31T09:15:23.620-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Time Zones</title><summary type='text'>We switched from Daylight Savings Time to Standard Time Sunday night. Switch your clocks back an hour if you haven’t done so yet.Talking about this the morning after, a couple amusing comments were made. One was a grape that it’s weird that Congress can just pass a law and declare what time it is.Another was that it was really weird driving through Australia, because there were places that had 15</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113077892359738282/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113077892359738282' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113077892359738282'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113077892359738282'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/time-zones.html' title='Time Zones'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113077462143067866</id><published>2005-10-31T08:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-10-31T08:03:41.513-08:00</updated><title type='text'>In Response to Neil: Hackett v Brown 2006</title><summary type='text'>Responding to Neil here. First of all, you gotta have EW comments, so your friends can respond on your blog without the same atmosphere as ezra's. I'm really proud of you for having a long conversation with Sirota about this and sticking up for party unity, but didn't feel like adding anything at this late date.Anyway, I really like the first comment in response to your hackett v brown post. it </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113077462143067866/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113077462143067866' title='4 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113077462143067866'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113077462143067866'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/in-response-to-neil-hackett-v-brown.html' title='In Response to Neil: Hackett v Brown 2006'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113044025936902898</id><published>2005-10-27T12:10:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-27T12:10:59.403-07:00</updated><title type='text'>They need a guarantee, but no promises</title><summary type='text'>Liberal blogs are wondering what to expect now that Harriet Miers has “withdrawn”. (I agree with TAPPED here that really the media should call a spade a spade – Bush released her).My feeling: more chaos. You see, there’s a fundamental contradiction going on. It went on with Roberts, but didn’t spiral out of control. For Miers it did spiral out of control. Here are the two parts:1) There is a </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113044025936902898/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113044025936902898' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113044025936902898'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113044025936902898'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/they-need-guarantee-but-no-promises.html' title='They need a guarantee, but no promises'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113043773957995613</id><published>2005-10-27T11:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-27T11:28:59.596-07:00</updated><title type='text'>"Mob to take over $500 million liquor industry"</title><summary type='text'>The Onion helps us celebrate the anniversary of the passage of the 18th Amendment. It made all alcohol illegal, which created such problems that it’s the only amendment to be directly repealed.When looking on the noble history of the Constitution I think it’s important to keep episodes like this in mind. In our current political world the FMA was partly defeated by the argument that it would be </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113043773957995613/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113043773957995613' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113043773957995613'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113043773957995613'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/mob-to-take-over-500-million-liquor.html' title='&quot;Mob to take over $500 million liquor industry&quot;'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113018358016912581</id><published>2005-10-24T12:52:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-24T12:53:11.873-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Whatever Will They Do</title><summary type='text'>In order to gain perspective, everyone should read this on the Democratic Party and this on the Tory Party. (That’s in England. Where Labour leader Tony Blair won the past 3 elections. He’s on the left.)England and America are probably the two most culturally similar countries to eachother that they could find. Yet in one country the media acts like the right is completely dead, and in the other </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113018358016912581/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113018358016912581' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113018358016912581'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113018358016912581'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/whatever-will-they-do.html' title='Whatever Will They Do'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-113018312316189124</id><published>2005-10-24T12:43:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-24T12:46:04.776-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Snarksalot</title><summary type='text'>Kind of interested in this NYT memo about the whole Judith Miller affair. I wish we had dealt with the controversy over our coverage of WMD as soon as I became executive editor. At the time, we thought we had compelling reasons for kicking the issue down the road. The paper had just been through a major trauma, the Jayson Blair episode, and needed to regain its equilibrium. It felt somehow </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/113018312316189124/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=113018312316189124' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113018312316189124'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/113018312316189124'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/snarksalot.html' title='Snarksalot'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112973914054647459</id><published>2005-10-19T09:24:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-19T13:01:11.120-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Dark and Light</title><summary type='text'>The National Review is pondering the nature of the Harriet Meirs battle.I actually think this is a profoundly significant signal in the ongoing -- and at times somewhat lamentable -- transformation of the GOP into a populist party. For example, I've written many times about how liberals don't understand that Fox News' popularity has had less to do with conservatism and more to do with populism </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112973914054647459/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112973914054647459' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112973914054647459'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112973914054647459'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/dark-and-light.html' title='Dark and Light'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112965977631040325</id><published>2005-10-18T11:11:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-18T12:00:26.216-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Pobrecitaa Conservistas</title><summary type='text'>Lot’s of blogs are busy ( Tapped  LRC Sullivan, Yglesias somewhere) being amused at right-wing martyr Bruce Bartlett, who was just fired from his think-tank for writing a book criticizing Bush “Imposter: How George W. Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy”, as emblematic of the collapse among the intellectual right-wingers, regarding disagreement on discretionary spending and </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112965977631040325/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112965977631040325' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112965977631040325'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112965977631040325'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/pobrecitaa-conservistas.html' title='Pobrecitaa Conservistas'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112871541967600747</id><published>2005-10-07T13:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-07T13:03:39.683-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Hackett v Brown</title><summary type='text'>In response to Neil’s questions on Hackett in the post below, I’ve been reading about the Hackett-Brown match-up. I feel bad for Hackett, because I’m pretty sure he really didn’t want to get in a primary battle and had a preference ordering: Run against DeWine &gt; Don’t Run &gt; Run Against Brown. So because of that, there are lots of posts about who would be better to run in Ohio, the respected </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112871541967600747/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112871541967600747' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112871541967600747'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112871541967600747'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/hackett-v-brown.html' title='Hackett v Brown'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112869551947190647</id><published>2005-10-07T07:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-07T07:31:59.476-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Constitutional Length?</title><summary type='text'>My roommate asked me today why everyone’s new constitutions (Afghanistan, Iraq, EU) are book-length-features, when we could make due with two or so pages. This comparison has certainly been remarked upon in the rightblogistan, generally as a subtext for how much better we are.I tend to think the short Constitution was from a naïve and rather good-willed time, and we are the exception not the rule</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112869551947190647/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112869551947190647' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112869551947190647'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112869551947190647'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/constitutional-length.html' title='Constitutional Length?'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112854258493382921</id><published>2005-10-05T12:52:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-05T13:03:05.010-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Lochner Dissent No More</title><summary type='text'>I'm increasingly amused when I read things like this from Tapped trying to figure out what Miers feels. In trying to read the tea leaves of what we can prove this person believes, no one is even pretending to make the distinction between "what is good policy" and "what is constitutional law".It's something we supposedly fetishize when we discuss Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.'s attitude on judicial </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112854258493382921/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112854258493382921' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112854258493382921'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112854258493382921'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/lochner-dissent-no-more.html' title='Lochner Dissent No More'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112853709449501245</id><published>2005-10-05T11:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-05T11:31:34.503-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Hackett Running for Senate</title><summary type='text'>http://warrenreports.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/10/4/12433/3089Remember when I said maybe Hackett wasn’t the best fit for the richest congressional district in Ohio?Yeah, well he’s a great fit for the state of Ohio as a whole. So it’s good to hear he’s running. Mike DeWine is also a good guy (one of four Senators to back McCain in 2000) and so I gotta say I’ll be proud to have either of them </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112853709449501245/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112853709449501245' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112853709449501245'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112853709449501245'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/hackett-running-for-senate.html' title='Hackett Running for Senate'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112845021338477136</id><published>2005-10-04T11:22:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-04T11:23:33.390-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Technocrats or Moderates?</title><summary type='text'>Ezra’s having an argument over whether to endorse Miers, who seems to not be a liberal nightmare. And from a policy perspective, I totally dig that. She doesn’t continue the Scalia tradition that scares many liberals. She does however continue the Michael Brown tradition of being an unqualified crony rather than experienced and decisive. Which I rambled “I’d rather a brilliant conservative than a</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112845021338477136/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112845021338477136' title='5 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112845021338477136'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112845021338477136'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/technocrats-or-moderates.html' title='Technocrats or Moderates?'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>5</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112843975926914297</id><published>2005-10-04T08:28:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-04T08:29:19.270-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Cronies</title><summary type='text'>Presidents appoint cronies. Yeah, it’s sad. And I really wish we could stop it, like having candidates discuss who their appointees might be before the election, not getting to swear them in without question afterwards. And I of course feel W has been worse on this than recent presidents, but it is not at all new. Really, this is how things are done and it’s usually unremarked.Kennedy made his </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112843975926914297/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112843975926914297' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112843975926914297'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112843975926914297'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/cronies.html' title='Cronies'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112843868991801917</id><published>2005-10-04T08:11:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-04T08:11:43.090-07:00</updated><title type='text'>No, He is NOT</title><summary type='text'>Can we please shut up about things like thisIS BUSH SECRETLEY PROCHOICE?Miers won't be liked by Democrats and isn't liked by Republicans; she's a longtime Bush loyalist with no paper trail. Which may be why they picked her. While it's dropped off recently, there's long been talk about Karl Rove's single-minded obsession with constructing an enduring Republican majority. That means, among other </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112843868991801917/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112843868991801917' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112843868991801917'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112843868991801917'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/no-he-is-not.html' title='No, He is NOT'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112843859413082796</id><published>2005-10-04T08:07:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-04T08:09:54.140-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Miers Hype</title><summary type='text'>Lots of thoughts on the new SCOTUS nominee. The three things you should read first are:TLaura’s post on the embarrassing Bush, not the terrifying oneThat is, Miers represents one side of Bush, and it's the relative good side -- the side that has Cheney rushing out on Limbaugh to calm the rubes, the bizarre, clueless, politically oblivious side, the self-absorbed but supremely un-self-aware, </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112843859413082796/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112843859413082796' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112843859413082796'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112843859413082796'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/miers-hype.html' title='Miers Hype'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112836372600897807</id><published>2005-10-03T11:21:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-03T11:22:06.016-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Question</title><summary type='text'>It’s politically centrist and hip to say that the Pledge of Allegiance reference to God is constitutional and you need to get over it. Even the Daily Show has mocked Neudow’s case. I don’t really buy the “it doesn’t matter” (every school child has to say it every day in view of their peers, and it’s irrelevant?), but the emphasis has been on how legitimate “under God” is.Since a) a large majority</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112836372600897807/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112836372600897807' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112836372600897807'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112836372600897807'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/10/question.html' title='Question'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112800560268662045</id><published>2005-09-29T07:52:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-29T07:53:22.693-07:00</updated><title type='text'>LibeRants</title><summary type='text'>Regarding Michael Brown’s testimony, some rantage over at &gt;LewRockwell.com:So this Federalism thing is really convenient. Any time the State really blows it, the Feds can blame the locals and vice versa. Michael Brown, the canned FEMA chief has informed us that it was all the fault of the state of Louisiana and the city of New Orleans. Fortunately, we can rest easy because Brown tells us "I know </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112800560268662045/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112800560268662045' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112800560268662045'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112800560268662045'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/liberants.html' title='LibeRants'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112793327851472042</id><published>2005-09-28T09:00:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-28T11:47:58.610-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Geena vs. House, no contest</title><summary type='text'>Last night I tried to check out the new Geena Davis show, Commander in Chief. The Achenblog has a  good review here I am sure the creators of the show are fully credentialed liberals who believe they are advancing the cause of women in politics. But what's next, President Geena breaking a nail catastrophically during a state dinner? The show has to somehow get beyond its own gimmick of a woman </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112793327851472042/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112793327851472042' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112793327851472042'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112793327851472042'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/geena-vs-house-no-contest.html' title='Geena vs. House, no contest'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112785328213297532</id><published>2005-09-27T13:29:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-27T13:34:42.216-07:00</updated><title type='text'>More FBI Agents to Monitor Pron</title><summary type='text'>The latest fun target for the liberal blogsphere has been the FBI’s announcement that they plan to focus on obscenity laws more. Not child-pornography, which is already heavily attacked, but pornography that apparently is disqualified because of its obscene content, and yet generally flies under the radar without trouble. This is the stuff that falls under Justice Potter-Stewart’s famous “I’ll </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112785328213297532/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112785328213297532' title='4 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112785328213297532'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112785328213297532'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/more-fbi-agents-to-monitor-pron.html' title='More FBI Agents to Monitor Pron'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112783324569069898</id><published>2005-09-27T08:00:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-27T08:00:45.696-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Serenity Review</title><summary type='text'>Serenity was an utter blast, what can I say. I doubt anyone who has seen the TV show was even considering not going. Seriously, this is the type of niche film that should charge $20 tickets because they have a hardcore audience, and not much casual audience.So should people who haven’t seen the show Firefly bother to see it? Well the character exposition, is done quite well and lets you know what</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112783324569069898/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112783324569069898' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112783324569069898'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112783324569069898'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/serenity-review.html' title='Serenity Review'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112776791318341714</id><published>2005-09-26T13:51:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-26T13:51:53.330-07:00</updated><title type='text'>That James Lee Witt Magic</title><summary type='text'>Every time people compare recent FEMA chief and crony Michael Brown and Clinton’s successful FEMA chief James Lee Witt, I think “why shouldn’t this sort of thing be an issue in elections.” And then I think of one particular Gore flop during the 2000 election.In early summer, Gore expressed his concern for hurricane victims and said he had personally gone to visit the disaster zones with FEMA </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112776791318341714/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112776791318341714' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112776791318341714'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112776791318341714'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/that-james-lee-witt-magic.html' title='That James Lee Witt Magic'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112774788515490245</id><published>2005-09-26T08:17:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-26T08:34:39.226-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Minor Items Round Up</title><summary type='text'>If anyone ever mentions that poor people are voting Republican because of cultural issues, tell them to &gt;read this and actually bother to find evidence next time.&gt;Supposedly good news on Cotton SubsidiesYglesias points out that currently we neither have the accountability of a Parliamentary system, but also suffer from the party discipline of one, a “worst of both worlds” that has rarely affected</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112774788515490245/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112774788515490245' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112774788515490245'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112774788515490245'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/minor-items-round-up.html' title='Minor Items Round Up'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112774610728768078</id><published>2005-09-26T07:48:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-26T08:32:31.266-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Serenity, Now</title><summary type='text'>Thanks to the fine people at Grace Hill Publicity I’m going to see Serenity later today. (If this falls through and the people at are not so fine, then I shall vituperate loudly.)Joss Whedon- the Oscar and Emmy-nominated writer/director responsible for the worldwide television phenomena of Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel-now applies his trademark compassion and wit to a small band of galactic </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112774610728768078/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112774610728768078' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112774610728768078'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112774610728768078'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/serenity-now.html' title='Serenity, Now'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112750936720971851</id><published>2005-09-23T14:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-23T14:16:35.916-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Interviews with Roberts</title><summary type='text'>I like John Roberts, the public-relations persona we see in committee. He seems a smart guy who you could have a lot of fun discussions with. He’d certainly be great at playing boardgames where you have to follow the strict rules for the larger purpose of a difficult exercise. And he has a good wit with mock-humble irony. He’d fit in very well with my friends.Which is why I can’t imagine for the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112750936720971851/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112750936720971851' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112750936720971851'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112750936720971851'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/interviews-with-roberts.html' title='Interviews with Roberts'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112750711949828057</id><published>2005-09-23T13:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-23T13:31:48.073-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Judicial Reticence and Logic</title><summary type='text'>The song and dance about judicial reticence is pretty absurd. It may seem I’m a bit late to the party in pointing this out, but I’m sure the issue is going to come up again soon anyway. Especially if the next Justice isn’t as clean-cut and as easy a pass as Roberts.I’ve been reading through the transcripts of Roberts hearings, and the degree to which he refuses to answer questions is pretty clear</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112750711949828057/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112750711949828057' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112750711949828057'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112750711949828057'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/judicial-reticence-and-logic.html' title='Judicial Reticence and Logic'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112750459556847829</id><published>2005-09-23T12:42:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-23T12:43:15.573-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Pork: Harder to Cut Than it is to Make</title><summary type='text'>Yglesias and others are watching the budget-cutting process with a close eye. I must say I’m glad Republican leaders are at least thinking about how to pay for Hurricane Recovery, which was not in evidence in our President’s speech last week.The most amusing line so far has been the Republican Study Group saying “just give us a copy of the appropriations bill, some red pens, and a quiet room”.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112750459556847829/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112750459556847829' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112750459556847829'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112750459556847829'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/pork-harder-to-cut-than-it-is-to-make.html' title='Pork: Harder to Cut Than it is to Make'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112750438480654936</id><published>2005-09-23T12:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-23T12:39:44.896-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Trolling the Electoral College</title><summary type='text'>Trolls and people foolish enough to feed the trolls over at Ezra's today.  The comments have degenerated into people saying A) Democrats ideas are badB) So bad that no one votes for themC) That more people vote for them doesn't count because that's not the way the game is played.Here's one troll continuing that, and my amused response.As for JR,Total votes for Democratic candidates for US Senate,</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112750438480654936/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112750438480654936' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112750438480654936'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112750438480654936'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/trolling-electoral-college.html' title='Trolling the Electoral College'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112742049686715988</id><published>2005-09-22T13:21:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-22T13:21:36.873-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Lurker’s Day</title><summary type='text'>That just makes me think of this, the best website for a television show ever (warning, major geeking ahead).But really it’s about blog-readers who don’t comment dropping a line to say hi.So, lurkers, today is your day.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112742049686715988/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112742049686715988' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112742049686715988'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112742049686715988'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/lurkers-day.html' title='Lurker’s Day'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112740168492555295</id><published>2005-09-22T08:07:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-22T08:15:54.323-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Your and Your Robot Overlords Make Me Cry</title><summary type='text'>Machines are not going to replace human labor anytime soon. Why?Long Answer: The Solow Growth Model.Short Answer: Human labor is really goram cheap.Long Answer Redux: I don’t know if Ezra or Neil took much economics, so I can’t say I blame them. But positivist lackeys at TechCentralStation have no excuse.The SGM is, right or wrong, the fundamental assumption for how economic growth happens. </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112740168492555295/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112740168492555295' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112740168492555295'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112740168492555295'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/your-and-your-robot-overlords-make-me.html' title='Your and Your Robot Overlords Make Me Cry'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112733553711581759</id><published>2005-09-21T13:44:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-21T13:45:37.123-07:00</updated><title type='text'>German Elections Update:</title><summary type='text'>Just because I find this interesting.The comments at TPMCafe Yglesias are really informative about the backgrounds of the East German Communists (Linkspartei) and why coalition with them is difficult. When living members of the party have had your friends shot, I guess it’s a big deal.Also, apparently Germany has its own Upper House that isn’t nearly as powerful as our Senate, but can block </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112733553711581759/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112733553711581759' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112733553711581759'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112733553711581759'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/german-elections-update.html' title='German Elections Update:'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112731505051366623</id><published>2005-09-21T08:03:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-21T08:52:43.126-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Job Wanted: Loyal Opposition</title><summary type='text'>Woo hoo! Civil Service Reform!Via TAPPED and Ezra (sorry, Internet was down yesterday) I saw the Talking Points Memo and Washington Post articles on other Bush-n-friends cronies who are getting nominated to important government posts. The Bush administration is seeking to appoint a lawyer with little immigration or customs experience to head the troubled law enforcement agency that handles those </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112731505051366623/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112731505051366623' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112731505051366623'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112731505051366623'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/job-wanted-loyal-opposition.html' title='Job Wanted: Loyal Opposition'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112715991077769448</id><published>2005-09-19T12:58:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-19T12:59:51.696-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Other Cool Things</title><summary type='text'>Musing about political polarization, lack thereof, and the chicken littles who worry about either paradigm.http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2005/09/political_polar.htmlThe best response to “Bush is a man of integrity” is this email I found on Andrew Sullivan’s site saying “A man whose government is filled with incompetent cronies, and who values loyalty above merit is no </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112715991077769448/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112715991077769448' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112715991077769448'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112715991077769448'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/other-cool-things.html' title='Other Cool Things'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112715769131860283</id><published>2005-09-19T12:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-19T20:43:30.256-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Parliamentary Comparison Day</title><summary type='text'>Oh, and conservatives need to SHUT UP about the German electoral result. It was disastrous for them.       What, why, darling Angela Merkel won the highest percentage of the vote? Well, while that’s a nice symbol, in parliamentary systems that often doesn’t mean much.       The narrative before the election: Gerhardt Schroeder was the Social Democratic Chancellor who ran on pro-EU, anti-American </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112715769131860283/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112715769131860283' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112715769131860283'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112715769131860283'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/parliamentary-comparison-day.html' title='Parliamentary Comparison Day'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112714773572688593</id><published>2005-09-19T09:35:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-19T09:58:24.910-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Cool</title><summary type='text'>Logan Feree has made a cool graphical representation of the Senate on the Left vs. Right plus Libertarian vs. Populist scorecard. Looks cool. I’m very interested in the forces that have pushed the Democrats towards Left-Centrism while pushing the Republicans towards Far-Right-Authoritarianism.Also, Radical Geek as a cool “International Ignore the Constitution Day”Unfortunately she only argues the</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112714773572688593/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112714773572688593' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112714773572688593'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112714773572688593'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/cool.html' title='Cool'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112673519763885291</id><published>2005-09-14T14:59:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-14T14:59:57.643-07:00</updated><title type='text'>What would you ask Roberts?</title><summary type='text'>Why doesn't anyone ask about Bush v. Gore? What he would have ruled.Or rather, did he accept the majority decision as in any way good law? Does he think it's acceptable that the justices (both Dem and Repub) threw law to the side when choosing a President was on the line? Everyone seems to have accepted that, but I don't see how this is in any way a good thing to encourage, especially for http://</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112673519763885291/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112673519763885291' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112673519763885291'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112673519763885291'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/what-would-you-ask-roberts.html' title='What would you ask Roberts?'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112664273919758403</id><published>2005-09-13T13:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-13T13:18:59.233-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Accountability, 10 Years On, and Negative-Sum Games</title><summary type='text'>Really good &gt;post at TAPPED about the lack of accountability in our current political system, particularly with regards to this administration.And Matt has a thoughtful post about the importance of being thoughtful and technocratic oriented when making your policy proscriptions. He does it more from the “look at those poor Republicans, stuck to bad ideas they trumpeted because of short-term </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112664273919758403/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112664273919758403' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112664273919758403'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112664273919758403'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/accountability-10-years-on-and.html' title='Accountability, 10 Years On, and Negative-Sum Games'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112662797794580581</id><published>2005-09-13T09:12:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-13T09:12:57.953-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Stop the Bi-Annual Circus</title><summary type='text'>Every two years (Every congressional session), the US Congress votes on a bill like this one to ban partial birth abortion. Every session the Democratic Senators say that this bill does not have an exception for the health of the mother, and ask that it be added. The Republicans say no, it passes, and the courts over-rule it because it does not have an exception for the health of the mother.Every</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112662797794580581/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112662797794580581' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112662797794580581'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112662797794580581'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/stop-bi-annual-circus.html' title='Stop the Bi-Annual Circus'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112662668051742082</id><published>2005-09-13T08:49:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-13T08:51:20.543-07:00</updated><title type='text'>56% to 38%</title><summary type='text'>http://www.freedomdemocrats.org/node/224 &gt;Logan found a helpful survey.States where pro-life outnumber pro-choice: Indiana, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, Idaho, Arkansas, Mississippi, West Virginia, Alabama, Louisiana, Utah, and North Dakota (Tied).States with a pro-choice majority that voted for Bush: Nevada, Colorado, Alaska, Florida, Wyoming, Arizona, Iowa, New Mexico,</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112662668051742082/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112662668051742082' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112662668051742082'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112662668051742082'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/56-to-38.html' title='56% to 38%'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112621057399167531</id><published>2005-09-08T13:12:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-08T13:16:13.996-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Yglesias has a great post on the fallacy of these "national greatness" politicians.Francis Fukuyama's much-misunderstood book The End of History isn't really about how there isn't going to be any more history. Instead, the thesis was that the forces of liberal democracy were now so strong that there wasn't going to be any more capital-H History -- just somewhat banal problem-management. </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112621057399167531/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112621057399167531' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112621057399167531'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112621057399167531'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/yglesias-has-great-post-on-fallacy-of.html' title=''/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112620950144255401</id><published>2005-09-08T12:57:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-08T22:21:04.490-07:00</updated><title type='text'>It's not helpful for Democrats to fight this way</title><summary type='text'>One of the reason’s I don’t personally blame Bush for every death in New Orleans is stuff like this:The Naval Medical Center in San Diego's Balboa Park was shut down to accommodate a visit by President George W. Bush Aug. 30, RAW STORY has learned, forcing patients to cancel chemotherapy treatments and hundreds of scheduled patient visits. "The pharmacy is closed. The emergency room is closed. </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112620950144255401/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112620950144255401' title='11 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112620950144255401'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112620950144255401'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/its-not-helpful-for-democrats-to-fight.html' title='It&apos;s not helpful for Democrats to fight this way'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>11</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112620454348495436</id><published>2005-09-08T11:35:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-08T11:35:43.490-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Reform Ohio</title><summary type='text'>Now this is the sort of thing progressives should really be getting behind in Ohio.From NYT:The Ohio secretary of state announced yesterday that a series of election-related constitutional amendments had qualified for the November ballot, including one intended to strip Republican elected officials of their control over drawing legislative districts.The amendments are sponsored by Reform Ohio Now</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112620454348495436/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112620454348495436' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112620454348495436'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112620454348495436'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/reform-ohio.html' title='Reform Ohio'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112619913725385479</id><published>2005-09-08T10:05:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-08T10:05:37.260-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Santorum the Christian Socialist</title><summary type='text'>I’m glad people are &gt;finally realizing that Senator Santorum (R-PA) isn’t a conservative, so much as a populist (or authoritarian, or communatarian, as is your bent). The man supports higher minimum wage, ending the death penalty, and protectionism. On the conservative side he is indeed very outspoken, but only on social authoritarian issues. In fact, his recent pronouncements on creationism in </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112619913725385479/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112619913725385479' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112619913725385479'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112619913725385479'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/santorum-christian-socialist.html' title='Santorum the Christian Socialist'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112619040297335739</id><published>2005-09-08T07:38:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-08T07:40:02.980-07:00</updated><title type='text'>No, Right there, You just lied again.</title><summary type='text'>I hate to score cheap political points off humanitarian disaster, so I’m going to make it clear that I don’t believe crank about the response to Katrina being slow because of federal-state-local confusion (ie federalism).http://www.freedomdemocrats.org/comment/reply/207http://www.redcross.org/faq/0,1096,0_682_4524,00.html#4524In fact FEMA is authorized to just ignore the Constitution when it </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112619040297335739/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112619040297335739' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112619040297335739'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112619040297335739'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/no-right-there-you-just-lied-again.html' title='No, Right there, You just lied again.'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112612360108098235</id><published>2005-09-07T13:06:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-07T13:06:41.090-07:00</updated><title type='text'>High Variance, Low Expectation</title><summary type='text'>Yay Democracy: A brief comment on the subject of this game, which, apparently, it's a bad idea to play. First off -- it's not a game. Assigning blame is a deadly serious matter. It's also integral to any sort of viable social practice. The criminal justice system relies on assigning blame to various people and punishing them. So does the civil tort system, and so does the non-criminal regulatory </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112612360108098235/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112612360108098235' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112612360108098235'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112612360108098235'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/high-variance-low-expectation.html' title='High Variance, Low Expectation'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112611785041584462</id><published>2005-09-07T11:30:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-09T12:40:24.183-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Figureheads for the win!</title><summary type='text'>Neil has opened the question of how important it is to nominate a Southerner for Democrats, come hell or highwater, with an electoral chart of Carter’s 76 victory highlighting all his Southern victories. One of the commenters points out that in that chart the north can be looked on as just as sectionalist and objecting to Southern politicians, but the general concept is still important and I’d </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112611785041584462/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112611785041584462' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112611785041584462'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112611785041584462'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/figureheads-for-win.html' title='Figureheads for the win!'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112611603702399525</id><published>2005-09-07T11:00:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-07T11:00:37.030-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Coincidence Yes, But Stilll Avoidable</title><summary type='text'>So we have a major humanitarian disaster, federal screw up, and three SCOTUS nominations happening at the same time, all without warning. The news cycle generated by the hurricane is going to warp political debate regarding the nominees – one party trying to use it to stall, the other party trying to get nominees through while no one’s paying attention.Does anyone disagree that replacing justices</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112611603702399525/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112611603702399525' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112611603702399525'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112611603702399525'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/coincidence-yes-but-stilll-avoidable.html' title='Coincidence Yes, But Stilll Avoidable'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112610787518632927</id><published>2005-09-07T08:43:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-07T08:46:17.140-07:00</updated><title type='text'>RIP Rehnquist</title><summary type='text'>I really wish more students of the Constitution had to read things like this. (I know my class didn’t have to.)A 1954 memorandum from clerk William Rehnquist to his boss, Justice Jackson: "A Random Thought on the Segregation Cases":After the Civil War, business interest came to dominate the court, and they in turn ventured into the deep water of protecting certain types of individuals against </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112610787518632927/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112610787518632927' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112610787518632927'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112610787518632927'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/rip-rehnquist.html' title='RIP Rehnquist'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112568704741965148</id><published>2005-09-02T11:48:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-09-02T12:02:34.426-07:00</updated><title type='text'>A matter for the courts, they say</title><summary type='text'>So there’s theories that Judicial Review isn’t a counter-democratic force, because rarely do courts really overrule the legislature. In fact, for their most controversial decisions they usually are backing up what the legislature wants to do, but just can’t do for institutional or political reasons. My favorite line from the article:     “A generation of Supreme Court analysis has been done as if</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112568704741965148/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112568704741965148' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112568704741965148'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112568704741965148'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/09/matter-for-courts-they-say.html' title='A matter for the courts, they say'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112550247374077460</id><published>2005-08-31T08:33:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-08-31T08:49:22.803-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Zimbabwe Zenate Zucks</title><summary type='text'>Zimbabwe is seen as the epitome of democracy gone amuck. A charismatic revolution leader sweeps into office, consolidates power, and uses every trick in the book (goon squads, outlawing political opponents, destroying the economy of opponents, biased judges) to stay in power while still having an electoral process. While in power he has denied private property, human rights, and free speech.The </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112550247374077460/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112550247374077460' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112550247374077460'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112550247374077460'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/08/zimbabwe-zenate-zucks.html' title='Zimbabwe Zenate Zucks'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112508554070031142</id><published>2005-08-26T12:44:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-08-26T12:45:40.706-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Serious Pwnage</title><summary type='text'>If you don’t know who Christopher Hitchens is, he’s supposed to be a very eloquent, intellectual, left-wing defender of the War in Iraq. In fact most left pundits have been upset at how trashy he’s gotten as he defends the war and mocks people who think it’s a mistake – enough that he’s a source of controversy (he now has a column at Slate.com , for instance). Much like AndrewSullivan.comHe’s </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112508554070031142/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112508554070031142' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112508554070031142'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112508554070031142'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/08/serious-pwnage.html' title='Serious Pwnage'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112420663214721113</id><published>2005-08-16T08:36:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-08-16T08:37:12.156-07:00</updated><title type='text'>They Come and They Go</title><summary type='text'>Can anyone tell me what happened to Left to Right a blog of academics, a favorite pointed out to me by Neil? It used to post all the time with really provocative thoughts on various issues. Now it rarely has anything, and besides things like comments turned off and a rotating cast of characters, it posts things like this:Marital rights generally go hand-in-hand with parental rights.  Any legal </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112420663214721113/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112420663214721113' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112420663214721113'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112420663214721113'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/08/they-come-and-they-go.html' title='They Come and They Go'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112413533470913871</id><published>2005-08-15T12:48:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-08-15T12:48:54.720-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Roberts' True Form!</title><summary type='text'>Slow news weekend (not counting atrocities and political despair in Iraq, which our media doesn’t). So the pendulum of attention has  shifted back to the federal judiciary.Justice Rally II (The Quickening!) was yesterday, although it didn’t get much hoopla. Nor did it throw much hoopla around, such as towards SCOTUS Nominee Roberts. I think this is in part because the conservative establishment </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112413533470913871/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112413533470913871' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112413533470913871'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112413533470913871'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/08/roberts-true-form.html' title='Roberts&apos; True Form!'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112412301080138324</id><published>2005-08-15T09:15:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-08-15T09:23:30.810-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Yes, Gay Marriage Is a Civil Right Issue</title><summary type='text'>“Black people are bad neighbors. They all live in the ghetto downtown, and look how crappy it is. I can’t let them live in my neighborhood, because then it would become just as bad as those areas.”Ha, what a bad argument that was. It perpetuated racial divisions, and consigned a large part of American society to poor and socially-immobile areas. And it was based on horrible logic that 30 seconds </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112412301080138324/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112412301080138324' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112412301080138324'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112412301080138324'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/08/yes-gay-marriage-is-civil-right-issue.html' title='Yes, Gay Marriage Is a Civil Right Issue'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112386116154412832</id><published>2005-08-12T08:38:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-08-12T08:39:21.553-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Not Exactly Turtledove</title><summary type='text'>&gt;Interesting review of “What if We Don’t Act Now?”, a series of essays by historians about alternative-history theories, and what events would have happened if key event X had not taken place. I enjoy alternative fiction, and I also have little respect for “great man” theories of history, so it’s interesting to me.The reviewer writes about how this field enraptures conservative historians and </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112386116154412832/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112386116154412832' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112386116154412832'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112386116154412832'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/08/not-exactly-turtledove.html' title='Not Exactly Turtledove'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112370838785661133</id><published>2005-08-10T14:10:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-08-12T09:34:54.543-07:00</updated><title type='text'>To the Sullivans (part 2):</title><summary type='text'>I’m going to continue yesterday’s post about “nested open-minded-ness.” Being tolerant and all Enlightenment-y isn’t just important on the broader world stage or in choosing a political wing in America; it’s also important when defining our own political party. [Addendum: Even more relevant in response to NARAL's rather out-there ad accusing Roberts of defending violent extremeists. But hey, when</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112370838785661133/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112370838785661133' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112370838785661133'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112370838785661133'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/08/to-sullivans-part-2.html' title='To the Sullivans (part 2):'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112368787449394369</id><published>2005-08-10T08:29:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-08-10T11:36:06.396-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Poor NARAL</title><summary type='text'>Kos, Neil, and Ezra are discussing NARAL’s renewed plea for principled support of the right to choose.I entirely understand why NARAL endorsed Chaffee (R-RI) so early in the cycle. As I posted here, a lot of liberal single-issue groups have done better than their counterparts because they are willing to cross party lines. Their issue matters more to them partisan success. This has resulted in a </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112368787449394369/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112368787449394369' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112368787449394369'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112368787449394369'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/08/poor-naral.html' title='Poor NARAL'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112362068898867535</id><published>2005-08-09T13:51:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-08-09T13:51:28.996-07:00</updated><title type='text'>To the Sullivans of the world</title><summary type='text'>Dan at &gt;AndrewSullivan.comWhen gays and lesbians express disgust or contempt for, say, the Pat Robertsons of this world, we’re accused of being intolerant—and isn’t that hypocritical of us? After all, isn’t tolerance what we’ve been asking for? How can we refuse to tolerate Pat Robertson?But as Manji points out, being intolerant of intolerance is not the moral equivalent of being intolerant.Yes </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112362068898867535/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112362068898867535' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112362068898867535'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112362068898867535'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/08/to-sullivans-of-world.html' title='To the Sullivans of the world'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112360213396785967</id><published>2005-08-09T08:36:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-08-09T08:42:13.986-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Odds and Ends of Democratic Deficiences</title><summary type='text'>Matt has cute citations of Constitutional problems today. First, angst over the lack of DC representation now that Congress is considering renaming 16th Ave to Ronald Reagan Ave.Next, there’s pondering why do we have an election day on a weekday that most people don’t get off. I personally believe universal voting is the ultimate solution, as the government should represent the preferences of all</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112360213396785967/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112360213396785967' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112360213396785967'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112360213396785967'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/08/odds-and-ends-of-democratic.html' title='Odds and Ends of Democratic Deficiences'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112351736731703720</id><published>2005-08-08T09:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-08-08T09:46:24.870-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Monster Democratic Direction Post</title><summary type='text'>Inspired from Dev @ FD.orgPeople are seeming to get it finally, be it Hillary, Yglesias, or guest blogger Michael Lind on TPMCafe. Many elites believe that moving to the center requires giving up the authoritarian/populist leanings of your party, and being a libertarian moderate. The media loves the socially liberal Republicans (Giuliani, Spectre) and the economically libertarian Democrats (</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112351736731703720/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112351736731703720' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112351736731703720'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112351736731703720'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/08/monster-democratic-direction-post.html' title='Monster Democratic Direction Post'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112317582025962548</id><published>2005-08-04T10:16:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-08-04T10:17:00.266-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Eleanor Holmes Norton May Soon Have a Real Job</title><summary type='text'>The National League of Cities just endorsed a measure to give Washington DC a seat in the House of Representatives, balanced by an extra seat in Utah, until the next census revamping. So that’s a nice step.Let’s be clear about what I mean when I say compromise. As a moderate and someone afraid of myopic extremism, I very much like practical compromises. But for our system to work, there must be </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112317582025962548/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112317582025962548' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112317582025962548'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112317582025962548'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/08/eleanor-holmes-norton-may-soon-have.html' title='Eleanor Holmes Norton May Soon Have a Real Job'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112309818279955091</id><published>2005-08-03T12:41:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-08-03T12:43:02.806-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Ezra's YIMBY</title><summary type='text'>Dangerous chemicals on trains may or may not be the target of terrorist attacks.In most states and cities, they could be banned from coming too near central population centers.Not in DC!.Since the DC City Council lacks the authority to ban it (it's interstate commerce) and lacks any clout in Congress to get anything done about it.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112309818279955091/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112309818279955091' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112309818279955091'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112309818279955091'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/08/ezras-yimby.html' title='Ezra&apos;s YIMBY'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112309143914565139</id><published>2005-08-03T10:47:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-08-03T10:50:39.163-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>TAPPED has a sad rant about our current infrastructure spending (ie, the massive Energy and Transportation bills that just passed Congress). It's not that we spend too much, we spend less than most Western nations, just how the money is distributed is the result of congressional partisanship, committee placement, and seniority.Ie, cities (on a per capita basis) get screwed.I really think I should</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112309143914565139/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112309143914565139' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112309143914565139'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112309143914565139'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/08/tapped-has-sad-rant-about-our-current.html' title=''/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112196841521731037</id><published>2005-07-21T10:52:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-07-21T10:53:35.226-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Token</title><summary type='text'>Tokenism isn’t a good way to solve society’s problems of inequality, but it generally is a good sign of commitment to diversity or a particular group. In particular, when factor’s affecting a groups membership are so extreme that they don’t have one member of group Y, then it’s a generally a sign that those factors are out of control. I certainly have yet to hear anyone prominent who claimed “I’m</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112196841521731037/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112196841521731037' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112196841521731037'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112196841521731037'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/07/token.html' title='Token'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112196204936733380</id><published>2005-07-21T09:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-07-21T09:09:13.616-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Healthcare is for Geeks</title><summary type='text'>I want universal healthcare. I believe all the normal liberal lines about it. Risk-pooling is efficient, not a government monstrousity. Keeping citizens healthy is a basic function of government, and not something left to consumerist fate. Perverse incentives drive costs up (lack of preventative care, emphasis on unnecessary procedures). Costs are spiraling upwards faster than GDP or inflation. </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112196204936733380/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112196204936733380' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112196204936733380'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112196204936733380'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/07/healthcare-is-for-geeks.html' title='Healthcare is for Geeks'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112187548430869216</id><published>2005-07-20T09:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-07-20T09:12:55.256-07:00</updated><title type='text'>SCOTUS Nominee Thoughts</title><summary type='text'>Bush's nomination of Roberts is surely part of a broader agenda: Get rid of the women on the Supreme Court, overturn Roe, overturn Brown v. Board of Education, and finally, overturn Marbury v. Madison. The conservatives will not be happy until they have a Supreme Court with the courage to rule itself out of existence. Nowhere in the Constitution, as I recall from the time I glanced at it in the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112187548430869216/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112187548430869216' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112187548430869216'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112187548430869216'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/07/scotus-nominee-thoughts.html' title='SCOTUS Nominee Thoughts'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112180081466554573</id><published>2005-07-19T12:19:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-07-19T12:20:14.676-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Average Americans</title><summary type='text'>By the way, the far left corners of the blogosphere have been crowing [porn star] Carey's appearance at the dinner will prove to be a "messaging disaster" for the GOP, tarnishing their pro-family image, muddying their morality machine, and in general reminding average Americans that Republicans are hypocritical hedonists who get squeamish about gay marriage but love the idea of threesome with a </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112180081466554573/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112180081466554573' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112180081466554573'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112180081466554573'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/07/average-americans.html' title='Average Americans'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112179692123620745</id><published>2005-07-19T11:13:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-07-19T11:15:21.253-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Last Half of the Daily Show Now Watchable</title><summary type='text'>If my step-dad reminds me of Bush, then Bernie reminds me so much of my grandmother. Bernie is a certain type of conservative intellectual who denies any partisan affiliation, and then a) defends everything in terms of conservative ideology and b) has relentlessly anti-Democrat rhetoric. (There’s a passage in Al Franken’s book where he defeats Bernie so soundly on a talk show that a caller calls </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112179692123620745/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112179692123620745' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112179692123620745'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112179692123620745'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/07/last-half-of-daily-show-now-watchable.html' title='Last Half of the Daily Show Now Watchable'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112135383201448953</id><published>2005-07-14T08:08:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-07-14T08:10:32.023-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Dictators  Conference Committee</title><summary type='text'>Both Brad's post on stalled Social Security reform and Neil's post on Supreme Court justices demonstrate the damage being done to modern politics by the "conference committee".</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112135383201448953/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112135383201448953' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112135383201448953'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112135383201448953'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/07/dictators-conference-committee.html' title='Dictators &lt;heart&gt; Conference Committee'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5712205.post-112135283782962769</id><published>2005-07-14T07:52:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-07-14T07:53:57.836-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Hidden Information</title><summary type='text'>Poor Neil tried to start a discussion about a truly moderate Supreme Court nominee possibility, Ed Prado. The post quickly got taken over by trolls saying Bush could appoint whoever he leaks because that’s what people elected him to do.Did they? Something you don’t want to see in a nice democratic system is randomness. Do we elect Presidents for their Supreme Court justices? Bush’s first term </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/feeds/112135283782962769/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5712205&amp;postID=112135283782962769' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112135283782962769'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5712205/posts/default/112135283782962769'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://rousseau.blogspot.com/2005/07/hidden-information.html' title='Hidden Information'/><author><name>Rousseau</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://hcs.harvard.edu/~tony/ocelot.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
